So like I'm just wondering, if this was an episode of Law & Order, or real life (I know for some its hard to think this way) and you looked at the pile of evidence surrounding this event, would it not be an open and shut case? We have this man saying that he heard the countdown, we have video evidence of squibs, we have Larry Silverstein ADMITTING to the attacks, we have fightfighters and port police on record saying to "watch that building cause its coming down" and witness testimony about to be released with the newest Loose Change to bombs in the building....all this and still people say there is no evidence.
<a href="http://www.livevideo.com/video/ConspiracyCentral/17CE03151BB64B14900AE1CA93685480/incriminating-wtc-7-evidence.aspx">UPDATE MORE EVIDENCE</a>
Feb
23
23
"Pull It" Revisted (how soon we forget blaring evidence)
Rating: 503
Pull | it | Revisted | Larry | Silverstein | Larry | Silversien | Pull | Demolition | Sept | 11th | WTC |
Nov
09
09
Rumplestilskin Revisted
Rating: 28
